> I wonder in comparison to the > Polaroid and Nikon which is more important, the extra 800 dpi or the > extra bit depth (16 vs. 14)? I doubt it is really 16 bits... Do you have a URL that says that the actual A/D being used is a 16 bit A/D? If it were, there would be no room for tonal curve moves. You always have to provide more space (higher bit depth) than the actual data, or you can't make tonal adjustments without losing data. 16 bit data would require a 24 or 32 bit space to work in. Also, 16 bits is entirely unnecessary to capture image data at, since no film you will be scanning can have a dynamic range of 4.8!
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-25 by Austin Franklin