Clark Thomas wrote: > But... I have a VISION of something that > would help. Help all of us maybe, but at > least me - 52 year old guy with 37 years > experience in wet darkrooms (and three sons > ages 2, 4 and 6, which I'm certain has SOME > effect on my limited brain power of late). Clark, let me applaud your vision and encourage you to take this further. (Let me also express solidarity with your mental condition: I'm 54, developed my first film 41 years back, and my daughters are aged 4 and 6.) > A detailed chart (of some kind), or maybe a > web site of individual pages dedicated to > the description and presentation of various > list members' methods, materials, and > evaluations. It could be set up like a > database, so you could select those who use > 7000's or 2200's, or those who use MIS Ultra > Tones or Selenium Piezotones. A very useful project. There are lots of people on this list who could contribute short illustrated accounts of what they do. While I am keen on databases for some tasks, this project might work better in a simpler, less structured form. Just offering a text search of the site might make the information accessible. I just looked at your website, and liked its clarity and simplicity. < www.simplephotographs.com > Something similarly clear and straightforward would do for this project too... I like encouraging other people to do things... Peter Marquis-Kyle www.marquis-kyle.com.au
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Which B&W system/too broad I know
2003-05-02 by Peter Marquis-Kyle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.