On 5/9/03 9:23 AM, "Tim Atherton" <timatherton@...> wrote: >> Some like compositing clouds from one image into the dull sky of another >> image; some like straight photographs. >> >> I like straight. > > Jim, but that's the whole point - I bet your "straight" photograph isn't > actually "straight"! > > tim Hi Tim, I do alter contrast and density when I print. I think Photoshop is a wonderful program, and computers make it easy to produce bad work. I once saw images by a photographer who had transfered cloud portions of some of his images into some of his other landscape photographs. I thought the result was dramatic -- and corny. I don't dislike photo collages. I just don't like fabrications that are passed off as realistic. Images by photojournalists Salgado, Bresson, and many others are art without altering the content of the image. The art was in seeing and feeling the moment, the pure moment photography's forte. Sure "the camera is just a tool." But if someone uses the camera as only an adjunct to a process, then the result is less of the kind of art that I call photography. I could take the lens off the front of a view camera, remove the ground glass, and pour paint through the camera onto canvas. The results might be wonderful, but I would call it a painting, not a photograph. Just my opinion. Best, Jim
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: un-altered camera image
2003-05-10 by James Klebau
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.