----- Original Message ----- From: "Truman Prevatt" <tprevatt@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 7:58 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions > > The tinkering done in inkjet printing is a drop in the bucket compared > to the wet darkroom. There never has been, probably never will be, a > turn key system to producing a good image on a piece of paper - be it > light on silver or ink on cotton fibers. > > Truman Martin, I would have to agree with Truman on this. When I last cleaned out my darkroom I had to toss a 18" high stack of boxes of different kinds of 11x14 silver fiber paper I had tried! On top of that the currently available systems for dedicated B&W printing have really improved over the last couple of years not to mention the last 4 or 5 years. A great deal of the confusion comes from the variation in what people consider easy to use and what they consider good quality. This is not helped by discussing it on a text based user group! At the moment I would point a new comer in the direction of a dedicated B&W inkjet printer. I would recommend the Epson 1280 with a continuous inking system (CIS) with Inkjetmall Piezotone inks and the R9 pluggin from bwguys.com or Inkjetmall's plugin which is the same thing. It's not a perfect system and not the cheapest but I think that it is the easiest way to start as of today. Need to save some money substitute MIS FS inks. Need to save more money go with MIS-VM or Ultratone inks and use the free RGB separation curves but be prepared to do a bit more image tweaking. All are equal in terms of mechanical type problems such as clogging and banding. While still an issue it is generally minor compared to a couple of years ago. In a few months my opinion may change as new products finally reach the market. If you are having trouble accessing the group homepage get in touch with me off-list. There is not a lot I can do but sometimes I can help. Martin Wesley
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions
2003-05-15 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.