Don't overlook 4x10 -- that is a great format. One of my favorite photographers, Mary Ellen Mark, has made the trek you are on: 35 to 6x6 then to 4x5. For scanning, the 4x5 is excellent -- I'm just into portability and more available light stuff these days. --Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 4:06 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] re: film processing > > > > > I am trying to downsize from 8x10 and 4x5 field cameras to 35mm and > > maybe someday digital. > > Funny, I'm going the other way - first from 35mm to 6x6 and now to 5x4 and > 10x8 - well, as soon as Phillips starts taking orders for a 10x8! > > Julian > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] re: film processing
2003-05-16 by Ken Carney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.