I shoot Portra at its rated speed. I don't remember how XP2 works; does it have the orange mask or does it look like B&W film? That may influence the results you are seeing. It depends on how the lab sets up their processing. Color film printed as B&W will be very low contrast; B&W film (or chromogenic that looks B&W) printed as color will have blinding contrast. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Kobrin" <skobrin@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 14:38 Subject: [Digital BW] Portra B&W > I have shot a few rolls of Portra after using Super XP2 regularly. It > seems to scan very nicely, but I have two questions and an > observation. > > First, I shoot XP2 at 320 rather than 400. Is that common practice, > or do people shoot Portra at its nominal speed of 400? Second, and > more subjectively, XP2 has a "creamy" or flowing feeling to it that > seems to be missing from Portra. Has anyone else noticed that? > Last, based on two rolls -- not a large sample -- it seems that while > Portra scans more easily than XP2 the prints I get back from the > processor, which I use only as contacts anyway, are more contrasty > and have a more limited tonal range than XP2. > > Steve
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Portra B&W
2003-05-20 by Anthony Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.