Thanks all for this great discussion. As regards scanning neutral density images (B & W) on a color scanner, would it make a difference if instead of changing the sensors, the light source was another color? I presume the best solution would be a sensor array that was not sensitive to color at all but just light intensity. Tony -----Original Message----- From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 12:15 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning comparisons Truman, > Quantum efficiently has nothing to do with it. Well, yes it does. Quantum efficiency is the ratio of the number of photogenerated electrons captured by a sensor to the number of photons incident upon the sensor during a period of time. What that basically means is that red, because of it's %80 quantum efficiency over a VERY broad spectrum will fill the well much faster than the other two colors, which means red will smear and bloom first, given the same amount of light energy of each color. > Red is at the low end > or the visible frequency spectrum. Normally the higher the frequency the > wider the bandwidth of filters at that frequency, unless you use a local > frequency reference to down convert the signal. Why is this not the case > for red light which is a lower frequency than blue light? Different > materials for CCD's have different frequency reposes. I guess I don't > understand why "red" produces more energy output. Because the CCD is most sensitive to it, which is what quantum efficiency is! > The energy of a photon is Planks constant X it frequency. A photon of > blue has more energy than a photon of red. That doesn't matter. What matters is how the CCD sees it, which is quantum efficiency... > Different scanners use > different light sources. I am still at a loss - not that I am disputing > it - with your statement. I just don't understand. Light sources have nothing to do with it. The light is filtered by either the RG or B filter, and the CCD reacts to that color light only. I don't understand why you think that matters? All the light sources cover the spectrum that is being detected. Austin Yahoo! Groups Sponsor <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050191 82:HM/A=1564415/R=0/*http:/www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60164784&partid=3170 658> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupmai l/S=:HM/A=1564415/rand=695069525> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-23 by Anton Pickard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.