> More simply: if you know the exact spectral response of, say, the red > element of a CCD sensor, and I tell you I got a red value of 130, can you > tell me the original spectral input? > > Answer: no. Jon, I don't understand the relevance of that. You do NOT have only the red element (unless it's only red, that is), you have three values. Also, I do not see how knowing the exact spectral response of the CCD is required to do this. It IS one method, but, IMO, a poor one at best, as it adds another variable that is unnecessary. What you do is simply create a "map" for the RGB values to grayscale values using a LUT. The LUT is generated by taking a full spectrum image with both the B&W film, exposed and developed as you like and the color film, scanning the two films on the same scanner, and "matching" the graytones to the RGB tones at the same point in the image. Of course there is going to be some error, but I believe the error is insignificant. I do not believe this needs to be calculated, it can be, if the mapping is deterministic, what is called, characterized. If scanner differences are an issue, you simply characterize this for the different scanner, following the same procedure. If you do it once, you can do it a thousand times, for any combination of films. Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.