HI KEITH-
MY COMMENTS IN CAPS BELOW:
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Editor P.O.V.
Image Service" <editor@p...> wrote:
> OK, I'll buy Mark's numbers on inks costs.. Hell we've known that
dirty
> little OEM secret for years...
>
IT'S WORSE THAN GILETTE
> OTOH: He's nuts in calling film and traditional
prints "digital"...
> Sure, the individual Silver Salt grains are exposed individually,
BUT,
> and this is a big BUT, they lay over each other and in depth, not
just
> in a uniform 2 dimensional pattern. An emulsion is a 3 dimensional
> colloidal suspension of Ag grains in some type of gelatine or
> gelatine-like layer.. The random overlays and depth of the emulsion
> clearly create an analog value set, not a digital one..
>
HMMMM...SOUNDS LIKE PHOTOSHOP LAYERS?
> His facts on "DuraBright" inks (he misspelled the name, not I) are
> completely wrong as well.. Along with the info on which OEM inks
the
> 1270 uses. As for his commentary on the resin encapsulated EPSON
> pigments, GEEZ! Part of the problem with them on microporous
papers or
> on the vast majority of RC type papers is that the epoxy resin
capsule
> will NOT bond to the receiver and rolls off like a miniature ball
> bearing... In no way do those resin capsules break open on
impact...
> What would be the point (unless the ink inside the capsule is a
dye)?
> Why encapsulate, cause potential metamerism, and other issues,
only to
> have it disgorge raw pigment particles onto the paper? Just put
the
> pigments in suspension instead... If his model were true, you'd
face
> the silliness of creating larger pigment particles, and creating
higher
> clog potential just to place much smaller pigment particles on the
> receiver? It's sheer nonsense..
>
IN FAIRNESS TO HIM, I BET HE GOT THIS FROM EPSON
> On behalf of Berkeley alumni everywhere, I want to apologize for
Mark
> having a Physics degree and still getting the physical chemistry of
inks
> so messed up.. ;-) He may be a great artist. A chemical engineer
or
> physical chemist he ain't.
WELL...I GUESS HE WON'T WANT TO BE THE GUEST SPEAKER AT OUR BAY AREA
BW PRINTERS MEETING <G> OR MAYBE HE WILL....
> Keith
>
>
>
> "Just some guy," and caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON
printer
> User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo
> Publications), at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/
>
> "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks
together
> guys"
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************
> CONFIDENTIALITY & COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
> This e-mail message, including attachments and contents, is ©
Copyright,
> Keith Krebs, 2001-2002, All Rights Reserved. It is expressly for
the
> sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
> privileged information. Absent the express written authorization of
the
> author, any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, transfer, or
> distribution is explicitly prohibited and taken at your own risk.
If you
> are not, or are unsure whether you are, the intended recipient,
please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the
original
> message. Violations will be prosecuted to the FULL extent allowed
under
> applicable civil and criminal law. Imagery published or distributed
in
> violation of these conditions shall be subject to a $1500/image
> liquidated damages charge, in addition to any applicable Copyright
> violation penalties.
>
> POV IMage Service Banner
> ****************************************************************
> { The P.O.V. Image Service Website is still at http://www.p-o-v-
image.com/ }
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Very interesting article on evolution of Digital Printing
2003-05-29 by Tom OConnell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.