Does anybody know if the Epson 2200 Rip is available in a "Trial" version? I don't see it on the Epson USA site. Thanks, Sierra Gold --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "robert_ardinger" <rardinger@k...> wrote: > The Epson RIP uses at least one of the Cyan and one of the Magenta > inks (it may use both of each) along with the 2 black inks. This can > be seen in Mr. Peter Nelson's helpful web page on metamerism: > > http://studio-nelson.com/inkjet/bw22003.htm > > and in a less skillfully done image I scanned and enlarged (and > sharpened to allow definition of the color of the dots): > > http://home.kc.rr.com/rardinger/epsonrip.jpg > > (this image is a direct scan of a print I made with the 2200/Epson > RIP/matte black/Epson enhanced matte) > > I cannot see much if any yellow ink used in these samples. It is the > yellow ink that is thought to be the problem with much of the > metamerism (so I have read). > > The Epson 2200 RIP does not have any ability to alter tone (any > ability that I can find at least). I tried altering the tone of the > image file in PS but got less than great results and more blocking up > of the shadows (although perhaps with more tweaking it might work). > > Overall the supplied directions are wanting (still not sure how to > change from the supplied profiles as the program will not use other > profiles I have, possibly because it knows they were not made for the > RIP but I am not sure it is that smart). > > Epson support for this product, although meaning well, was hampered > by a lack of a working knowledge. They did follow-up and call back > with help for an install conflict problem I had. > > The prints (matte black ink, Epson enhanced matte) are a bit warm but > not much. I like "colder" prints better but can easily live with the > image tone from the RIP. > > I think a good B&W solution should have come with the printer as they > marketed it that way. To mentally ease the cost of the RIP one could > think of the pricing scheme of the new Epson 3200 scanner, one could > suggest that the 2200 as marketed is the "Standard Version" and for > $695 one that will do great color and OK B&W (probabably quite OK for > many people although perhaps not those on this group list). Adding > the RIP makes it the "2200 PRO" version for $895 and it will do much > better B&W. WIth that logic, I am pretty happy with my $895 purchase > and ability to use the same printer/inkset/paper for both color and > black and white prints. > > I would like to hear from more folks that are using the Epson 2200 > RIP for B&W (or even color but perhaps that would need to be on the > 2200 group list) as I bet the RIP can do more than I can get it to do > with my present knowledge. > > Robert > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel Staver" > <daniel@p...> wrote: > > > From what I've read in the various forums the Epson RIP produces > a > > > warm B&W print as it seems to only use the black and light black > > > inks. There are also no toning options as far I can see.....
Message
Re: Epson 2200 RIP -inks used (Was: Best course of action ...Epson 2200)
2003-06-02 by flyfishingusa2002
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.