Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: IJC and Ilford Smooth Pearl was Re: [Digital BW] Re: Oriental Fiber-Based Inkjet Paper--Initial Comments

2003-06-03 by Carl Schofield

Robert,

I guess I'm pretty close to the densities you are getting with the 
Kamar coated ISP, using Antonis's profile.  I'm also quite pleased with 
the results and delighted to have IJC.  The PC users have StudioPrint 
10 which sounds similar to IJC and also has the advantage of automated 
density acquisition (at least from the Eye-One spectrophotometer) for 
profile construction.  Do you know if Bowhaus has any plans for 
incorporating this feature in IJC?  Here is a link to a review of 
StudioPrint 10:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EpsonWideFormat/message/31408

Carl
On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 04:47  PM, Robert Morrison wrote:

> With Ilford Gallerie Smooth Pearl and Antonis's IJC profile (number 
> ISP_10)
> I'm getting 2.25 uncoated and 2.26 with two light coats of Kamvar...if 
> I go
> a little heavier I go up to 2.51.  There is very, very little bronzing 
> after
> the Kamvar...and the surface is completely even through the 
> hilights...I'd
> say this is a winner...pending the release of the Oriental paper.  I 
> did
> have to use inkjet control to make a slight change to the light black 
> ink
> for my printer...but it was a single adjustment and I was right on the 
> money
> up to 2.5 dmax.  IJC is a spectacular product...its just a shame that 
> the
> windows users will have to wait...for once...;-)
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> On 6/2/03 12:21 PM, "Carl Schofield" <scho@...> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 02:14  PM, Antonis Ricos wrote:
>>
>>>> Kamar varnish kicked up the dmax about 0.15 units and I'm wondering 
>>>> if
>>>> I should re-linearize the profile after the varnishing.
>>>
>>> Yes, I would say so. You may gain a small benefit in shadow 
>>> separation
>>> by
>>> redistributing your densities based on aims for the new dmax. Did you
>>> hit 2.5
>>> coated?
>>
>> No, only 2.25, but I don't trust the densitometer I'm currently using
>> for accurate readings at these higher densities because it uses an led
>> light source.  I'm thinking of getting the new GM Eye-Photo package
>> with the pro spectrophotometer, primarily for monitor/color profile
>> generation, but do you think it would also to be able to provide
>> accurate density data for use with IJC?
>>
>> Carl

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.