----- Original Message ----- From: "Antonis Ricos" <antonisphoto@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 2:42 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: OPM vs Epson driver > John, > > it's not so much about "how good" OPM is at resampling: it just doesn't at all! > It sends to the printer whatever gray tiff you open as is. > > So, you are correct, the closer to 720 the file is, the better. You may not see a > big difference past, say 400-500 dpi, but will certainly see pixelation if you > send a 360 dpi image. The same image printed through the Epson driver will > print smoothly. In that sense, there is an extra step that one needs to take if > their files are below 400 dpi (at 100% final print size). > > As for the 16 vs 8 bit.... it definitely likes the 16bits better (it was originally built > that way) , but an 8bit 720 dpi file will be just fine. > > Just to clarify: this is not about scanning resolutions and extracting info from > the original etc - it's just about matching device dots to pixels. > Antonis, Would this be a case where converting back to 16-bit just prior to printing would be in order? I know you beta tested the IJC/OPM software and are a long time user of the Piezo/R9 plug-in. Can you give us your comparison of print quality and workflow quality of the two? Martin
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OPM vs Epson driver
2003-06-05 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.