Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: OPM vs Epson driver

2003-06-05 by Martin Wesley

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Antonis Ricos" <antonisphoto@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: OPM vs Epson driver


> John,
>
> it's not so much about "how  good" OPM is at resampling: it just doesn't
at all!
> It  sends to the printer whatever gray tiff you open as is.
>
> So, you are correct, the closer to 720 the file is, the better. You may
not see a
> big difference past, say 400-500 dpi, but will certainly see pixelation if
you
> send a 360 dpi image. The same image printed through the Epson driver will
> print smoothly. In that sense, there is an extra step that one needs to
take if
> their files are below 400 dpi (at 100% final print size).
>
> As for the 16 vs 8 bit....  it definitely likes the 16bits better (it was
originally built
> that way) , but an 8bit 720 dpi file will be just fine.
>
> Just to clarify: this is not about scanning resolutions and extracting
info from
> the original etc - it's just about matching device dots to pixels.
>
Antonis,

Would this be a case where converting back to 16-bit just prior to printing
would be in order?

I know you beta tested the IJC/OPM software and are a long time user of the
Piezo/R9 plug-in. Can you give us your comparison of print quality and
workflow quality of the two?

Martin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.