Digital BW, The Print

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl 
Schofield <scho@m...> wrote:
> Robert,
> 
> Thanks for checking.  Charles at Bowhaus thinks that there 
shouldn't be 
> any problem with profile compatibility between software 
versions, but 
> he has referred the problem to the programmers. 

Carl,
Does this mean the same as saying that a particular ijc profile 
should produce the same result with one version of OPM as with 
another? I posted earlier that your linearized EAM_MK profiles 
seemed to give noticably different results when I used them with 
OPM 1.02b5 compared to using 1.02. I guess this this might be 
more a result of my 2200 being made to work "better" with 
1.02b5, rather than the profile needing to be "corrected" for that 
OPM version. 

Would my densitometer data for a 26-step grayscale (printed 
using your "cool" EAM profile with 1.02b5)  be useful  in order for 
me to to understand where I am? I'll be getting that data shortly. 
Have you already posted (or could you post) your grayscale 
densities for EAM paper somewhere so I can compare?
Phil