Since the densitometer I'm currently using > does not conform to any specific ANSI standards I don't think a > comparison of these values to ones from another densitometer would be > very meaningful. Carl and Phil, using a densitometer with standard density readings is essential if you are using IJC. In this case, the discrepancy in the results or readings between two different users would be made greater by non-standard instruments. What you get with a non-calibrated instrument is still a smooth curve, i.e. when you plot your grayscale output it will make a smooth curve and that should help produce nice separation between steps etc. But you'd be missing out (a) on achieving maximum density and (b) on proper overall gradation in parts of the scale. That would depend on the actual shape that you would get in that - otherwise smooth - curve of the plotted densities. IJC is based internally on an ideal set of densities which it generates for a given dmax and paper white set of values. If you can't track those properly because of an out of whack instrument, you are simply missing some - but not all - benefits of the system. Antonis
Message
Re: [Digital BW] New IJC/OPM Profiles
2003-06-11 by Antonis Ricos
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.