Digital BW, The Print

I am mac user, G4 OSX etc, I would buy a PC in a heartbeat if it would make
a quad on 2200.  It is much cheaper to go that route than the other way (PC
to Mac).  If print permanence is an issue, 2200 is the only game in town,
and quad is the only way to get darkroom quality.  I was planning to buy a
second printer when 2200 quads came out anyway, and add a extra computer to
drive it.  The machine itself is productive, so of course I would buy
whatever it takes.  I don't want the big printers, all my orders are small
prints and framers don't want the roll paper ultrachromes, I would much
rather have small printers making lots of small prints.  I know about the
cost difference.  This is a matter of meeting the market.
tom robinson

Robert Eversole wrote
>  However, if we were to eliminate these barriers, I still
> believe we 
> are fighting an uphill battle getting many Mac devotees to integrate a PC into
> their 
> workflow "just to improve their image quality and production".  But don't get
> me 
> started on that one.