I'm about to start a project shooting 10x8 and output has been specified as being 'up to' 50x40. I need to shoot neg for a whole load of boring reasons. having done tests and asked around people who use both drums and flatbeds, for negs, oil mounted flatbed is the way to go - but a good flatbed. I use a 1680pro and the optics aren't good enough for what i want. Don't just count pixels, but stuff like variable focussing and razor sharp optics count. I've just had a scan done on a creo and an imacon of a 160 asa colour neg. The imacon is the worse scan IMO. Another advantage of the oil mounted flatbed is that you can use a mounting station and mount a whole batch up. Also cheaper than the imacon. I was lucky to be able to take advice from a number of folk who have and use drums, imacon's and flatbed. And whilst chromes are best drum scanned - not everything is. However I'm shooting colour so you may find BW works differently. Julian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Allyen Wilson" <awilson@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:06 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed Scanners? > Mostly B&W Negs. But some Trannies. 50-50 medium format to 4x5. > > On 6/12/03 3:33 AM, "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@...> wrote: > > > are you scanning negs or trannies? > > > > Julian > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Allyen Wilson" <awilson@...> > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:16 AM > > Subject: [Digital BW] Flatbed Scanners? > > > > > >> Once again the "which scanner is best?" question arises for the group. > > What > >> desktop flatbed scanners are high quality and reasonably priced. I am > >> willing to spend up to $1,500 (Microtek Artixscan 1800f) but am not sure > > if > >> it is worth $1,100 more than the Epson Perfection 3200. My use for my > > files > >> is fine art prints, not snapshots of the kids and dog. I print large and > > my > >> photographic subjects are usually dimly lit, ie. Shadow detail is > > important. > >> > >> I have been having all my negs drum scanned so am used to high quality, > > but > >> the cost is getting me down. I figure I should have a good scanner for the > >> bulk of my work and use a drum scan when I need the really big prints. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Allyen > >> > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed Scanners?
2003-06-12 by Julian Thomas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.