--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, HPA <tom@h...> wrote:
> I am mac user, G4 OSX etc, I would buy a PC in a heartbeat if it would make
> a quad on 2200. It is much cheaper to go that route than the other way (PC
> to Mac). If print permanence is an issue, 2200 is the only game in town,
> and quad is the only way to get darkroom quality. I was planning to buy a
> second printer when 2200 quads came out anyway, and add a extra computer to
> drive it. The machine itself is productive, so of course I would buy
> whatever it takes.
For the record, I am a Mac user as well. I have never used a PC in my office until I
began this company. I prefer the Mac for most of what I do, short of RIP'ing files and
playing solitaire.
I wouldn't have a PC to this day either if RIP'ing files, plain and simple, wasn't best
done on a) a separate workstation from your creative workstation, and b) a Windows
operating system. Windows is not my idea of elegant but, like you said, better that
second workstation be cheap, productive and easily available. I well sleep at night
(sometimes) by recognizing the PC as the best tool for that particular job, period.
Regarding your requirement for a 2200 driver, I am still looking into the possibility of
adding our screening for the 2200, thereby taking control of the individual ink
channels and I will get back to you as soon as I have some information. Until then, if
you become impatient with my efforts and would like to contact me offline, I would
encourage you to do so.
Cheers,
Robert
--
Robert Eversole
President
ErgoSoft U. S. LLC
reversole@...
T 703.464.0876
F 703.783.6201
IM ergosoft1Message
Subject: Re: review of new StudioPrint 10 RI
2003-06-13 by roberteversole
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.