David, No offense taken. I actually applaud anyone's efforts to gain a more direct control over their materials and processes. I know what you mean about suddenly having your materials go out of production. I was devastated when Oriental Seagul went off the market. Not only can a paper or other material suddenly disappear from the market but, worse in my mind, it is drastically changed by the manufacturer without notice. Even if you go back to the manufactured materials, developing your own is a wonderful way to learn how things work and what is and what isn't critical to the results. Martin Wesley --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., davidhatton@t... wrote: > Hi Martin, > > I do understand what you're saying and I do agree that certain > proprietry info needs to be confidential to promote not only R&D but > competition. It was said more in a blackish jest than anything. > > I was using it as a lever to support my argument against an artists > dependency on manufacturers whims. It's not unknown for a > manufacturer to just stop producing a paper altogether leaving people > high and dry. > > Developing (no pun intended) ones own paper and processes goes some > way to removing this dependancy. > > I hope this explains my statement and apologise for any offence... > > DH
Message
Re: [Digital BW] sizing uncoated papers
2001-09-29 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.