Garry, My point exactly! If it works for you, great. But I get tired of the bashing when in reality it just doesn't fit your style. It has its place just as anything else you use for production of a print. Enough of the holier than thou with regards to digital or film. Dave -- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Garry Sarre" <garry@s...> wrote: > Well after holding out, partly because of money, I'm considering > > jumping into the digital camera realm. I still have budget > > considerations and since my current set up is a Canon EOS 1N with > > some good lenses it makes sense to look at the Canons. Used D60's > and > > new D10's are not that far off in price so I'm focusing on the > D10's > > Tim > > Hey,didn't Tim say 'Real World'? > > I have printed for 25 years starting with the very first cibachromes > in 1976. > > I shoot Portrait with a D60 and convert to sepia and print through a > 9600 onto photorag with matte black ink. I fit 70 images onto a half > gig card and have never shot anything except RAW (best quality). I > do almost all my work in 16 bit not 8bit (chalk and cheese for my > work). This gives me an uninterpolated (after camera interpolation) > file size of 16bit 32meg to play with. > > This takes me to 24x30 through PS Interpolation (10% steps)quite > nicely for PORTRAIT. Anymore can be still great if you smooth out a > few interpolation artifacts here and there. The CMOS and firmware on > the D60 has less artifacts than the D1X and D760 after tests I did. > It is a wonderful camera for B@W fine art printing. > > As far as the real world goes. Side by side, my clients MUCH prefer > the digital image onto matte paper than hasselblad onto RC paper. > > I have to spend an average of two hours more per client preparing > slides as before they were sent out, however my sales have improved > by 20% per portrait client because I can shoot a little more and get > better shots to choose from and can easily fix up duds where > necessary. > > My work flow has been brought forward by about 3 weeks. That is > delivery is 2-3 weeks earlier and that has effectively paid for the > new D60 and part of the 9600. (a surprise bonus.) > > Summary: Digital for Portrait - more time spent and higher sales. > > I miss my softar on the Blad though (Guassian Blur on second level > just dont cut it) > > Garry Sarre > > www.sarre.com
Message
Re: Taking the plunge? The Real World
2003-06-17 by Dave Tevis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.