----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Staver" <daniel@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:39 AM Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation > Ernst, > > you can set up the linux machine as a print server and print to it > directly from Photoshop on yur own PC. That way you don't need any > additional licenses, and you can print comfortably from an environment > you know well. Then it could be done from Qimage as well I think which would be a an even better setup. > On linux you need to install the Samba file and print services to share > your printer, while In windows you install the free Adobe Postscript > drivers and point them to the shared Linux printer and its associated > PPD. Does it handle printer files up to 500 MB ? So you also have Ghostscript or something else in between for the interpretation of the PS files on the Linux box. It then becomes a long chain, I'm not so keen about that. I guess part of Qimage's better interpolation will not survive that translation either. Isn't there a possibility to throw a raw (tiff) directly from Qimage that the driver can handle ? Print from Qimage to a hot map or something like that. Postscript isn't always the best way on colour management either > It's not perfect, I still have to enter some specific driver settings on > the Linux machine, as it seems to ignore them if I set them in the PPD. > But once you set the settings in Linux they stay that way until you > change them again. Different sets of settings can be saved, so > essentially you would only have to run a single command to change to any > predefined set of settings. Wonder whether my friend can add something to Roy's concept so the whole becomes a bit more "salon faehig". Reading Roy's latest additions it is at its core better than anything else. But Roy's time will be limited. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.