> Then it could be done from Qimage as well I think which would > be a an even better setup. Yes, any application that can print from windows would do fine. > Does it handle printer files up to 500 MB ? I don't think the size of the print matters - I've printed 300-400mb files from Photoshop to QTR, but it's very slow compared to printing locally with the Epson driver. This is partly because I'm running my Linux server inside a virtual PC on my Windows computer, which is much slower than a real PC. > So you also have > Ghostscript or something else in between for the > interpretation of the PS files on the Linux box. I think all printing with CUPS is handled by Ghostscript regardless of where the input is coming from or what type of file you're printing, but I may be wrong. > It then > becomes a long chain, I'm not so keen about that. I guess > part of Qimage's better interpolation will not survive that > translation either. Isn't there a possibility to throw a raw > (tiff) directly from Qimage that the driver can handle ? > Print from Qimage to a hot map or something like that. You certainly could set up a Perl script or something that continously checked a folder for incoming files and processed them once they arrived, that's easy. The question is how do you want them to be processed? > Postscript isn't always the best way on colour management either In this case I think that's uncharted territory. I haven't read about anyone who specifically tested printing from a color-managed application in Windows to CUPS on Linux. Since you mention color management, are you thinking about using this as a color RIP? or are you talking about quadtone profiling? If you were to use QTR I would assume you'd want to switch off all color management and leave that to the QTR curves/profiles? > Wonder whether my friend can add something to Roy's concept > so the whole becomes a bit more "salon faehig". Reading Roy's > latest additions it is at its core better than anything else. > But Roy's time will be limited. Agreed, what's needed is usability, ease-of-use and interface improvements, other than that it's got pretty much everything we want. -- Daniel Staver http://daniel.staver.no
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Daniel Staver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.