Daniel, you wrote: > > Does it handle printer files up to 500 MB ? > > I don't think the size of the print matters - I've printed 300-400mb > files from Photoshop to QTR, but it's very slow compared to printing > locally with the Epson driver. This is partly because I'm running my > Linux server inside a virtual PC on my Windows computer, which is much > slower than a real PC. I've had my share of bad luck with Epson 9000 drivers on 2000 and XP, the longer the chain, the more spooling done in between makes the chance that there is something printed less and less. The RIP being the exception as Windows doesn't get a chance to interfere in that setup. > > It then > > becomes a long chain, I'm not so keen about that. I guess > > part of Qimage's better interpolation will not survive that > > translation either. Isn't there a possibility to throw a raw > > (tiff) directly from Qimage that the driver can handle ? > > Print from Qimage to a hot map or something like that. > > You certainly could set up a Perl script or something that continously > checked a folder for incoming files and processed them once they > arrived, that's easy. The question is how do you want them to be > processed? The RIP that I have can tag the hot map to a certain printer and/or printer setting. > > Postscript isn't always the best way on colour management either > > In this case I think that's uncharted territory. I haven't read about > anyone who specifically tested printing from a color-managed application > in Windows to CUPS on Linux. > > Since you mention color management, are you thinking about using this as > a color RIP? or are you talking about quadtone profiling? If you were to > use QTR I would assume you'd want to switch off all color management and > leave that to the QTR curves/profiles? If there's a print server I would like it to handle all the printing that has to be done. 3 systems to do the scanning, editing, printing work is my limit. As long as Linux doesn't have more CM than a plugin in the GIMP I would think that loading Gimp-print with P2P treated Tiffs would be the best way to do it if it has to be Linux. > > Wonder whether my friend can add something to Roy's concept > > so the whole becomes a bit more "salon faehig". Reading Roy's > > latest additions it is at its core better than anything else. > > But Roy's time will be limited. > > Agreed, what's needed is usability, ease-of-use and interface > improvements, other than that it's got pretty much everything we want. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-18 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.