Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200

2003-06-20 by Roy Harrington

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Martin 
Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Shilesh Jani" <shilesh.jani@s...>
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
> 
> 
> > Bob,
> >
> > I agree with Martin.  The 1280 is a good choice.   I recently
> > participated in a Technical Print Exchange.  Comparing the 
1260 and
> > 1280, the prints were very similar in ramp smoothness and 
dottiness.
> > Both printers were  A LOT less dotty than the newer 2200 
printer
> > using a number of different RIPs.  So, unless you find a good 
1260,
> > you can confidently go with the 1280.
> >
> 
> Shilesh,
> 
> Unfortunately, I wasn't a member of the technical exchange but 
I have
> communicat3ed with Clayton and I gather he is writing up a 
summary plus some
> additional info.
> 
> From the samples you have you feel the 1280 and 1160 out 
performed the 2200?
> That's too bad. I was hoping that the 2200 would represent a 
step forward
> but I guess the mechanics really are not changing and the 
factors that
> govern "dottiness" and smooth tonality as simply staying 
constant.
> 
> Martin
> 

Hi Martin,

It's not so much the mechanics of the 2200, its what inks
are used.  Using standard Epson UC inks there are only
black and light-black used i.e. 2 inks.  Most people with 1160's
and 1280's are using 3 or 4 grays, and that is what makes
the difference.  I'm also going to be sending Clayton a print
from my 7500 (the only one in the exchange I think) that I
made with my QuadToneRIP and a custom created 5 grays
ink set.  It'll be interesting to see how a non-variable dotsize
printer stands up to all the others.

Roy

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.