--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel Staver" <daniel@p...> wrote: > > > Actually 1.1 works fine for this as well. I've had god results with > > > that > > > version, the only problem is speed. I can make 20 prints > > with the Epson > > > driver in the time it takes QuadToneRIP to do one print. That's not > > > specifically a problem with QTR though, but Gimp-Print in general. > > > > From what I understand from Roy, you need version 2 to get away from > > Epson's partitioning. > > No, 1.1 also partitions the inks any way you want them, but two inks at > a time. That is, you have one curve for black+light black, another for > cyan + light cyan, a last one for magenta + light magenta (and also > yellow of course). Since gimp-print allows you to print with either 4, 6 > or 7 inks with the 2100 you can effectively get rid of the additional > inks and reduce the printer to a 4 or 6 color printer. Sometimes that > makes the profiling easier. In a sense, you're both right. With 1.1 black & light-black are tied together -- and I think it does well in the transition from a density point of view. But the color change from light to dark is somewhat abrupt. This make the toning curve more difficult to design but it should be possible. With 2.0 you can control the transition better and the toning curve is very simple. > > > Also, not sure it is a gimp-print problem...because I think > > that's more > > or less what the OPM driver is based on...and the prints sail out of > > the 2200 with OPM. The speed issue is really surprising since they both use the same underlying gimp-print code. There are a lot of options that can be selected so I suspect it's a matter of trying different ones. With my 7500 I get what seems to me to be decent speed -- about 12 min for a full size 16x20. > > I'm running my printer from windows, shared over tcp/ip to a virtual > linux machine on the same windows computer, and then shared back again > to windows with adobe postscript - a fairly complicated setup. There > might be some significant implications for printing speed in that setup. > The advantage is that I can print directly from Photoshop in windows to > QTR and keep the printer connected to my windows machine for printing > with the Epson driver. If I connected the printer to linux VMware would > take over the USB port and I wouldn't be able to print with the Epson > driver anymore. This sounds pretty cool. One of the reasons I took my approach for QuadToneRIP is that using the standard printer workflow opens up lots of never even thought about possibilities. As some point maybe it'll be worth documenting it for others. Roy > > > -- > Daniel Staver > http://daniel.staver.no
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-20 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.