Steve, See Martins post that precedes this one. That is what surprised me, more the tone of it than anything else, you also go that way in your post as well. In other words, if we aren't professional photographers and haven't spent a million dollars and years of our time in our quest, then our tastes are insignificant and we wouldn't know quality when we saw it? Please remember, us "unprofessionals" are closer to the core audience that the professionals are trying to sell to. You say the MIS inks have problems, outside of the lack of curves at this point, what specifically do you see as a problem? Not trying to poke or anything, just curious. Also curious as to why you went to the MIS VM if you were content with the Piezo. Can't really disagree with your statements based upon your experiences, after all they are your experiences. My feeling is that most Piezo users would be happy and in the majority IF they had inks that worked as advertised (as well as the toning options available with the MIS inks at the moment) and the Piezo driver were as forgiving as the Epson driver. Why else would they be seeking alternatives and posting complaints if they were content? Terry --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., sdmey4@a... wrote: > Terry, Michael K.? What was it about Tylers post that set you back? It seemed > like honest advice geared to the new user trying to make up his mind on > which way to go. > I didn't see anything out of line from Tyler's post. I would say he has a > correct bias towards Piezo inks and driver, because he knows how hard it is > to match that quality, probably more than anyone. I can personally attest to > the fact that I've wasted the savings on the price of ink(piezo vs, MIS) on > Paper! 5 weeks of MIS inks with the 7000 = no savings and probably 200 hours > of my time. Hey! but this was my choice, I like MIS inks, they are quite > different from Piezo inks. I suspect most of the clogging problems come from > Small variable dot printers such as the 1160, which probably has the most > piezo users! What was touted as the best piezo printer by hundreds of posts > may in fact be wrong, especially for long term piezo use.Remember when it was > the 3000 taking all the heat? View the archives for a 10 to1 problem user > report on the 1160.(ten times as many 1160's probably) Readers, remember! > everything on these lists are opinions and this list reads sometimes like we > are getting MIS inks shoved down our throats as the Miracle inks, the anti > clog ink, the Vari tone ink, the $12.00 ink, The not brown ink, and on and > on. There are problems with MIS inks, in my opinion! > It might help to understand where Tyler is coming from, We both used MIS Inks > in 1998! 3+ years ago, and we where both happy to jump ship when piezo came > along, Thousands of dollars and hours spent fooling with these inks and > trying to get a work flow down. The Work Flow? Tyler mastered it, Jon Cone is > selling a variation of it with an all new driver! He is just giving a > warning to new users who think they can Jump on board Get MIS VM inks, load > up Pauls curves and get printing cheap! Cheap and Digital printing are direct > contradictions. Really, this list does read like a pro MIS list and a piezo > bashing one. Mike! You spent quite some time with Paul getting down with the > VM inks on your 7000. Even after getting it right on. it turns out its still > too much trouble, and that you've gone back to piezo! Tyler was just trying > to point out that after all the trouble the best your going to get is CLOSE > to piezo! I'm good with MIS on my 7000 for now, but I really want to get > into a simple grayscale 16bit piezo output, then everything else is the > actual file. I won't have to make as many test prints or make an adjustment > because I switched paper. New users? It all depends on how picky you are. See > some prints somewhere..... > Between the piezo list and this one its the same 10=15 people over and over > again. If you think the happy Piezo users are a minority, you gotta be nuts! > I'am happy with both ink sets right now! > Quadtone schizophrenic ;) > Steve M. > > In a message dated 09/30/2001 7:27:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > terryr1028@h... writes: > > Michael, > > > > Thank you. > > > > His post caught me off guard also, which prompted my reply. > > > > Honestly Tyler, you are one of those that I respect on this list and > > I didn't expect that from you. :-( > > > > Terry > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Getting started -- Cone or MIS? (LONG)
2001-10-01 by TerryR
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.