> So, does anyone know what all these various sprays and coatings > that are proposed here will do to print longevity ? Here is what one authority said: Ross Merrill, Chief of Conservation at the National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. (USA), in a 1997 speech regarding pastel conservation said as follows regarding fixatives: "Today there are a number of alternatives. Krylon Acrylic Varnish B72 is used by conservators. This product will remain unchanged for 400 years, but does have a tendency to saturate the surface. Grumbacher B77 varnish or "tough film" is the same as B72, but will not saturate. Krylon workable fixative and Sennelier fixative are both good products. One should stay away from Grumbacher's "blue label" fixative." See <http://www.bmi.net/knapp/iapsmerrill.html> Rohm & Haas's Acryloid/Paraloid B72 formula is widely accepted as archival, if for no other reason than it has been around for a long time. Although Krylon's B72 is not available any more (probably since Sherwin & Williams bought the company and decided not to pay royalties), some of the Krylon products may be very close to it. Grumbacher "Tuffilm" is widely available at art stores and not too expensive. Lascaux Fixativ is the real B72 but is rare and expensive. Krylon is the cheapest of the bunch, from what I can see. In my fade tests, a light acrylic coating has had no significant effect. If applied heavily, I find the dynamic range of the print to be shortened. We can never be sure what interactions may occur over the long haul, but my feelings are that a light spray may be a good idea for physically protecting the pigments somewhat from abrasion. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Lyson Print Guard or Krylon Kamar on Hahnemühle WT?
2003-07-02 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.