Digital BW, The Print

Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 7:42:48 AM, David Jackson wrote:

DJ> I seem to recall reading that, except for speed, the 2400 and 3200 are 
DJ> essentially the same in terms of scanning performance. Is this correct?

DJ> I can buy a new 2400 for $178. This would be a low-cost, first scanner for 
DJ> me which I would like to match up with Vuescan for scanning 4x5 negatives. 
DJ> Speed is not an issue.

DJ> Any thoughts?


The 2400 only has a thin trannie adapter for 35mm film.  I think you
are thinking of the 2450 vs the 3200.

Best regards,
 Richard  

mailto:richard@...

L i n k s  t o  m y  g a l l e r i e s:
http://fujirangefinder.com/document.php?id=246