Digital BW, The Print

At 08:46 AM 7/9/03 -0500, you wrote:
>Thanks to everyone (Doug, Alan, Richard, Russ, and Andre) who took time to
>reply to my original question.
>
>I'm going to have to double-check to be sure about the 2400 vs 2450 model.
>I'm pretty sure that it was the 2400 for $178, but,actually, when I wrote
>my question to the group, I was mistakenly THINKING of the 2450.
>
>I can afford the additional $ to get the 3200 over the 2400 and probably
>will go that route.
>
>NEW QUESTION:   The 3200 seems a little long in the tooth. Does anyone have
>any info or rumors about an update or new model from Epson before I put
>down my hard-earned cash?
>David,



>Long in the tooth!  It came out last Winter. I  hope they don't come out 
>with another so soon - I paid $400 for my 2450 and sold it a year later 
>for $125 so I could get a 3200.  I find it just perfect for my needs.  I 
>have a larger Umax Powerlook III with an 8 x 10 transparency lid that cost 
>$1200 five years ago. It's worth almost nothing today.  Umax hasen't shown 
>much in the way of newer and better and cheaper like Epson. I think, as 
>you say, the market is anticipating a huge switch away from consumer/pro film.


AZ



Build a Lookaround!
The Lookaround Book.
http://www.panoramacamera.us