Alex, just curious, was the paper you used here the Somerset Velvet coated, or was it the uncoated? Best, Mark R. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "B. Alex Pettit Jr." <a_pettit_jr@y...> wrote: > Executive Summary : Wow ! > > I finally received this used Epson 3000 > from a long truck journey from one end of the USA > to the other... Utah to Florida. > > When I did a first nozzle check, all looked fine, > and the head alignment required no change. > > Using the installed Cone Piezo inks and Driver, > the 8x10 prints on EAM, Epson Prem Luster, and > a few others looked quite similar to that obtained > with a Quad MIS set on my E2000P : very small banding, > but quite worthy of display. I was pleased at the > performance of an 'old technology' printer with > fat 12 uL dots. > > Last night, I moved the paper guide margins to the extreme, > loaded in a 17x22 sheet of Somerset Velvet, and started the > process. One hour, 15 minutes a print was created - > but What a print: it is absolutely Flawless. Even when > using a loupe, there is no banding at all. And of course, > the Cone drivers do an outstanding job of making the dots > invisible also. > > I am truly amazed. I don't know if this is just a lucky > print or what, but I can surely say that when an Epson 3000 > works, it works very, very well. > > I will print as much as I can with what is remaining of these > Cone Piezo inks to establish a basis of comparison for when > I swap to the MIS/MS set. > > Happy new wide format owner, > Alex > Orlando Florida
Message
Re: New (used) Epson 3000 Report
2003-07-13 by markroth61
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.