Tim, Thanks much for the tip and link...I'll give it another go, guess I'm spoiled by the fine results of the mis quad inks/EAM combo, and expected the same levels of detail and print quality. So maybe it's not a "waste" of money after all, but an "investment in the learning curve" :) --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Tim Atherton <timatherton@t...> wrote: > uncoated somerset velvet is one of the earliest watercolour papers tried out > for quadtones... it's still a decent paper, if a bit soft (lack of coating). > And was a favourite of Giclee printers > > You would probably have to hunt way back in the archives of this, or the old > Epson leben list to find stuff > > "Somerset Velvet (250gr) > This paper is the most popular sheet in the Iris Giclee industry for good > reason. It has an amazing whiteness that it's competition and detractors > claim is made from optical brighteners But the truth is that it doesn't use > optical brighteners and is more stable than Arches Watercolor in terms of > whiteness. How do we know? Jon Cone helped develop this sheet with Michael > Ginsburg of Legion Paper in the early 90s. The longevity of this sheet is > well tested and does not adversely effect dye or pigment inkjet inks. > Mould-made in the UK of 100% rag. Neutral pH. The color gamut of this paper > is not as good as coated papers such as the Enhanced Velvet. The results are > soft and are liked by many fine art printers." > > etc - as I recall you ahve to play with everything up a fair bit - colour, > saturation, contrast etc. > > see > > http://www.inkjetart.com/watercolor_printing.html > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: markroth61 [mailto:mark80905@h...] > > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:43 PM > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [Digital BW] Do not buy this paper... > > > > > > This is the claim MIS makes on its web site about Somerset Velvet > > uncoated paper: > > > > "This is the paper our prestigious testing group has concluded is the > > very best for making fine art Quadtone prints on a 4 color printer." > > > > I believed it, ordered it, and now am stuck with it. This paper gives > > flat results on the used 1160 I just bought (w/mis vm inks), > > regardless of tweaks (EAM works beautifully however). It does take > > colored pastels OK though, so now I will be spending hours hand > > coloring...(maybe good for the eyes to give them a rest). Just wanted > > to warn anyone who might be thinking of throwing any money at this > > claim/paper with hopeful results. (If I'm wrong, and there is a > > fix/tweak/curve someone has come up with for an 1160 to back up the > > above claim, please do tell. (Someone on this list said in an archive > > the paper was "terrible". Wish I had done a deep search on this list > > before wasting 40 bucks...will next time.) Mark R. > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, > > Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > > visiting this same page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier > > messages to keep them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the > > various resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Do not buy this paper...
2003-07-19 by markroth61
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.