Tyler, Yes, you are correct...I did find a way to salvage the use, a distance farm scene with strong blacks and good clouds/sky, but still very soft. I was expecting to pull strong close up detail out of this, but there are better coated alternatives I see now. It is a terrific watercolor paper I should add, just not for fine-detail b&w photo-inkjet work. mark r. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@t...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Julian Thomas" > <julianthomas@t...> wrote: > > My favourite inkjet print I've ever made is on that paper - with the > > original piezo quads > > > > Julian > > I don't doubt that for a second. Even though I don't use it, I love > that combo, very silvery. > To Mark R, if you so strongly disliked the initial impressions you > have of the look of the paper, no amount of tweaking is going to make > it look like the razzle dazzle options of the coated papers. > Better to use what you have left seeing what you think of a subtle > soft middle tone or high key on it, or one that is killed by strong > blacks (I'm ducking now), to see if you have some occassional use for > it
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Do not buy this paper...for strong detail
2003-07-20 by markroth61
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.