I think the theory is that since each step creates fewer "fake" pixels, the data stays truer to the original than it would if you did it in one step. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Frost" <bobfrost@b...> wrote: > Can anyone explain how a series of small upsamplings can produce better > results than one large upsampling? > > Bob Frost. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Simon Lamb" <simon@s...> > > I agree. I get better results using the Fred Miranda Stair Interpolation PS > action (which just automates doing a series of small interpolations in a > row) than I do with SmartScale.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Extensis SmartScale
2003-07-20 by Charles Bandes