The higher quality interpolation routines in the (free) panotools PS plugin are much better than the FM routine. mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Bandes" <byronbulb@y...> wrote: > I think the theory is that since each step creates fewer "fake" pixels, the data stays truer > to the original than it would if you did it in one step. > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Frost" <bobfrost@b...> > wrote: > > Can anyone explain how a series of small upsamplings can produce better > > results than one large upsampling? > > > > Bob Frost. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Simon Lamb" <simon@s...> > > > > I agree. I get better results using the Fred Miranda Stair Interpolation PS > > action (which just automates doing a series of small interpolations in a > > row) than I do with SmartScale.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Extensis SmartScale
2003-07-22 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.