Martin, The photogram/scan would be reflective and cheap, cheap so that I won't worry about it one bit (well maybe not that cheap ;-) ). The Duoscan already on hand takes care of the finer work for both reflective and transparency for the time being. I have put some Arches Hot Press through the 3000 without problem, though not enough to proclaim anything steadfastly. Not sure where I will stand on color use. If I were looking for resolution it would undoubtedly have to go towards a newer printer - maybe that's why it will be painterly for the time being ;-) This is also the approach I want to take so that I'm NOT trying to only go after the qualities of a silver print. Take digital printing tech. for what it can do, with the equipment I have. Skills to develop would then be in place if resolution became the target as tech. allows. Cleavis in AZ --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > Cleavis, > > Three directions at once. HmmmÂ… You will definitely fit right in here! > > If your 3000 is running well, I would use it for your B&W work. I > don't think that it is lacking in sharpness and has been the great > workhorse for quad printing. All the quad ink sets are available for > the 3000 but for maximum sharpness with the 3000 I think the Piezo > is the way to. The 3000 does have a poor reputation for handling heavy papers and would not do well for your "painterly" work. > > For the color I would want to go with one of the newer Epson's > myself. Maybe the 1280 or the 2000P. I think these will have an > easier time handling heavy art papers. I have put up to 350 gsm paper through the 1280. For really heavy stuff you would need to move up to a 7000 which is a big price jump. > > There are so many good papers you will just have to try some sample > packs and see what appeals to you. Once you have some reference > points, some of the comments on the list may help. > > There are a lot of scanners out there in the sub $500 category. Will you be scanning in a reflective or transparency mode for this work? > > There is just as much craft to ink jet printing as there is to > traditional photographic printing and it can be difficult at times > but very rewarding. > > One word of caution. If you are coming from a B&W smooth silver fiber point of view, ink jet B&W is a different animal. It is much more similar to matte silver prints. You can go with dye based quads and get very good glossy prints but I find them to be more like silver RC prints than silver fiber. So if you go with a quad pigmented ink set on matte paper, look at it as a new photographic medium and don't get caught up in trying to make it look just like silver. > > Martin Wesley > >
Message
Re: My Interests & some Background
2001-10-02 by lyonscox@mindspring.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.