That is at the pixel level only. 1/300 th of an inch is very small. very high quality magazines publish at 175 lpi (which is the realm you are entering into). At that line screen you are effectively (almost) doubling the # of tones in both directions for a total of 2.938x46 or 135 distinct tones. At a line screen of 133 - which is normal magazine res. 5.087x46 or 234 distinct tones. Add to that the fact the epson uses variable droplets (I believe 3 sizes) and even more tones are possible. Granted the dither pattern epson uses is not a line screen but you must be getting the idea that the dithering is not necessarily done on a pixel by pixel basis. On Sunday, July 27, 2003, at 12:04 AM, Clayton Jones wrote: >> If you are rendering an >> image at 300 PPI each pixel in the original image gets only enough >> real estate on the paper for 46 printer dots Regards, Loring Palleske Creative Imaging 905.441.2661
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Loring Palleske
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.