I have some prints, maybe > 10% of my prints, that have areas of light silvery tones. This is > the region where ImagePrint puts down dots with blank paper in > between, whereas the PiezographyBW driver I'm using more or less > fills this space with light gray ink, obscuring the paper base. Ron, I understand what you say and certainly can't dispute what you observe. All I am adding to the discussion is that "in theory", which means under ideal profiling conditions, the "loose dots" and the "filled gray" should result in the same density. IOW, let's say we take a 10% gray. Whether we make it up of darker dots spread apart or lighter dots packed tighter together, the result should read the same on a densitometer (with appropriate aperture) and seem the same to our eyes. I should add that this luminosity is best observed when > the prints are illuminated indirectly. I don't see this advantage > when illuminated by strong direct lighting. Well,... here is another rather big factor all these theoretical discussions leave out: the conditions under which we view these prints. I recently made a test of an "ordinary" print on EAM with PTs and an ultra-dmax print using the Ultrachromes (2200) on Ilford Smooth Pearl. Of course the difference is staggering if you put them on a wall with a spotlight on them, framed without glass. But leave them on a table in the middle of a living room lit by diffuse daylight, and the EAM print is starting to look pretty good! It's no magic. The diffuse reflections in the room lower the perceived black in the semiglossy surface. A whole huge dmax difference between 1.60 and 2.40-something is leveled by lighting conditons. Your experiences seem to fall in this category where theory meets perception. And, speaking of perception... the same crappy EAM paper (in the tests above) looked terrific when used with my Sepia profiles on the 2200 and dead flat out of the 7000/PTs. The dmax difference was minimal (like 0.05). It was the coloration that gave richness to anotherwise mundane paper. Go figure... Antonis
Message
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-27 by Antonis Ricos
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.