--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Frost" <bobfrost@b...> wrote: > Peter, > > Does it really matter that you can see dots in an inkjet print? Most > paintings are made with brushes, and you can usually see the brush strokes. > That doesn't seem to put people off spending $millions on paintings. Of > course you can see dots in an inkjet print if you want to; same as you can > see grain in a chemical print if you want to. But you can also just see the > image if you want to; the brain is very clever at ignoring unwanted details. > > Bob Frost Very well spoken, Bob, I agree that visible dots are by no means an appropriate criterion to distinguish between a good and a bad picture, - but couldn“t they be a criterion to distinguish between a good and a bad digital device? Bernd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Ruhrfoto/Bernd L.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.