> Thanks! Care to comment (anyone) on the print quality for (untoned) > grayscale images using the MIS Ultratones v. using ImagePrint? I > believe you mentioned in an earlier post that MIS improves upon > ImagePrints lack of shadow detail in dark tones. Any other areas > where it exceeds ImagePrint? You get dotless highlights and better detail in the shadows (providing you are using the correct workflow). Honestly I think prints from Imageprint are really good, I'm not certain everyone would find the difference worthwhile. You would probably do well to have a look at some prints made with the workflows you are considering before you make a change. And, since you already have Imageprint, I think I would wait a little bit and see how things play out with the empty cartridges, rips, inks and workflows that are coming for the 2200 in the following months. -- Daniel Staver http://daniel.staver.no
Message
RE: [Digital BW] MIS Ultratones for the 2200: questions
2003-07-30 by Daniel Staver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.