Digital BW, The Print

Paul,

I understand the reluctance to have UT-FS inks for the 2200 printer.  
However, I understand that the UT inks are significantly more 
lightfast than the current FS.  So why not make FS inks with the same 
technology base as UT?

Regards.

Shilesh


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> 
> >> There is
> >> no metamerism because no color inks are used (well other than the
> >> tonal modification of UT or VM).
> 
> >These toners are made from color inks, incidentally.  The key is 
keep
> >the amount of toner used relative to the gray inks low.
> 
> Also, the cool toner uses no yellow pigment, which is where most of 
the
> metamerism seems to come from.  (In the sepia toner there is 
yellow, and
> there is metamerism.  However, the sepia tone hides the problem.  
The look
> of the sepia tone just changes as one goes from indoor lighting to
> daylight.)
> 
> >... I can't imagine any reason why
> >MIS would come out with a UT-FS set.  ...
> 
> With the 2200's 7 inks, dual blacks &/or dual toners (cool and 
sepia) are
> the interesting options.
> 
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com