Nij- PMFJI, I've been using the small gamut Lyson inks for about 3 months and the Piezo for about a month. I have a few observations you might appreciate. It was a real hassle getting the Lyson inks to make the first good print... Clean, nozzle check, soak in windex... A week of frustration. But then some wonderful prints. The ability to tone is pretty exciting... But it takes a little work to adjust the tones to papers and the tendancy is to over tone. (there is no profiling like with piezo). Out of the box, piezo was a snap... And has been ever since... I really believe there is a greater range of gray with this than small gamut... And it prints WAY faster than the Epson driver... But is harder to center and fill the page (it can be done, but it takes some work). The cooler print is a clear winner on Lyson small gamut (especially on Lyson or Mitsibishi papers). The warmer, a clear winner on piezo. Any glossy print is better with lyson... I have not been happy with any glossy paper/piezo combination so far, but have produced some terrific ones with Lyson. Bottom line... I love them both. I use the Piezo more... Partly because it's quicker and partly because I'm still in awe of the great sublte shades it prints... But I wouldn't give up the small gamut... Glossy, cool... Etc... I think it's unbeatable there. Cheers, TOC Tom O'Connell --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Nij" <nigel@m...> wrote: > Terry, > > Perhaps you could help me, offlist maybe, to gen up on who makes all these > inks. Seriously, if you know something I don't - which sounds very likely in > this case, I'd appreciate the info. > > To throw another name into the hat, and based on your suggestion that inks > that don't work well with Epson weren't designed for Epson... what were > Lyson 'Small Gamut' inks designed for? I have heard _rumours_ those inks > kill print heads after a while! > > In fact... are Lyson inks available in the States? There seems to be very > little talk about them, if any, on this list. > > Best, > Nij > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: TerryR [mailto:terryr1028@h...] > <snip> > > This is true, but those inks that exhibit problems, typically aren't > > designed as an Epson ink replacement (such as Piezo), they are > > usually a derivative of another ink that wasn't initially designed to > > work with the Epson printers. Again, MIS and Generations are perfect > > examples of those that were designed specifically for the Epson > > printers. I have yet to hear of a clog that couldn't be undone with > > those inks, but can point you at many posts of those that even went > > as far as to disassemble their printers or other extreme measures and > > still couldn't clear the clog when using Piezo inks. > <snip>
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Getting started -- Cone or MIS? (LONG)
2001-10-03 by tomoc@yahoo.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.