> It looked like the center and edges of the print were not getting the same > amount of PUR. I thought that could be from the 1/4 inch glass, which was > on a towel and supported by particle-board, might be sagging or otherwise > not being totally parallel to the rod. I think Diversified's literature > indicates that the set-ups they sell use thicker glass. On the other hand, > it could be that a 1/2 inch rod is not sufficient to span a 16" print > without bending slightly. Unfortunately, the thicker rods get expensive. > > Diversified also has a pad that can be put under the paper. I think the > "softness" of the support is a variable that might need to be explored. As > I understand it, these long rods are not usually used on hard surfaces. I > think the medium is often dragged across the rod with a flexible web. > > I didn't do a lot of experimenting with 16x20 prints. I tried a few, was > not satisfied with the results, and ran out of time to do more. I think the > rod & PUR deserve more work, but I just have not had the time for some > months. A thorough search of how industry uses them might give some hints > as to what is needed to get good results. Robert probably has the most > experience with the rod and large prints, so searching his posts would also > be a good idea. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com Thanks Paul. I'll look up what Robert has to say. Tom
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Coating - again...
2003-08-01 by Tom Husband
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.