Sorry, forgot to give you the url for my filesharing site: http://homepage.mac.com/scho/FileSharing2.html On Sunday, August 3, 2003, at 01:21 PM, Carl Schofield wrote: > Steve, > > I dug around in my paper drawer and found an unused package of > Somerset Photo Enhanced paper (225 gsm). I believe this may be the > same paper you are using and it is #2 in the list of Somerset papers > in the list at the link you provided. I'm not sure if it is the > "Velvet" or "Textured" surface, since it was purchased a couple of > years ago. The surface looks very similar to the uncoated Somerset > Velvet (250 gsm) which I also have but haven't used. I profiled the > SPE paper for QTR 2.0 and uploaded the profiles to my filesharing > site. The profiles are in the "SPE.sit" archive, inside the > QuadToneRIP2.0 folder. This paper does not perform particularly well > with the UC inks and it has a dmax (1.51) even lower than BES (1.56). > The blacks are not very deep and also exhibit some mottling. This is > not the same paper as the Epson velvet fine art, which is reported to > have a much higher dmax, closer to that for EEM. The MIS Ultratone > (UT) and Epson Ultrachrome (UC) inks are both pigment inks. > > Carl > On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 08:12 PM, kiwikale wrote: > >> Hmmmm.....how would I find out the paper's dMax? If it is any help >> (UK to US) this >> paper is sold exclusively by Legion in the US as Somerset Photo >> Enhanced Velvet >> (there is also a Textured variation). I believe it is also the same >> paper as Epson >> Velvet Fine Art (not available in the UK). See: >> >> http://www.inkjetart.com/news/archive/IJN_11-05-02.html >> >> (This page raises another question - are the UT inks pigment or dye?) >> I am not at all >> familiar with Brightcube Eclipse Satine but am I right in assuming >> from the above >> article that the paper would be closer to Hahnemuhle Photo Rag? >> (which by the way >> costs at least twice as much as Somerset in the UK). >> >> Thanks again >> >> Steve >> >> >> >> >> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield >> <scho@m...> >> wrote: >>> Steve, >>> >>> I haven't used this paper, but if the dmax is relatively low try the >>> the BES profiles. The approximate relative dmax order for the three >>> paper profiles I made are EEM 1.70, HPR 1.64, BES 1.56. >>> >>> Carl >>> On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 04:19 PM, kiwikale wrote: >>> >>>> Many thanks to Roy for making all this hard work available and to >>>> Carl >>>> also for doing >>>> the 2200 profiles. I have just one question for Carl. Which of the >>>> three sets of paper >>>> profiles would you recommend for use with Somerset Enhanced Velvet >>>> from St >>>> Cuthberts Mill? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: QuadToneRIP new features
2003-08-03 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.