This is exactly what the 2 links I provided do. The non-QI image is a straight print through PS7 to my 1270 using the same parameters as the QI print ie no Epson 1270 drievr included. The non-QI print is printed at 300dpi whereas QI has interpolated the image to 496 dpi (for whatever reason) and added some auto- sharpening. I have never had any problem with the amount of sharpening which QI has added to any of my prints. HTH Gareth --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Loring Palleske <lorpal@m...> wrote: > Why not sharpen in PS? > > What I would like to see is an image printed through PS and an image > through Qimage. No additional processing on either or the same > processing on both and do a comparison. > > > On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 06:30 AM, garethlock4472 wrote: > > > Definitely. > > > > My system consists of PC with W2k, PS7, Epson 1270 with Ultratone > > CIS. > > > > I only use a fraction of Qimage can do and I do most of the image > > manipulation in PS7 but use QI to optimise the print quality and > > autosharpen. > > > > I have uploaded a couple of scan of PS7 printing and QImage printing > > for you to see real world scans. In addition to being an excellent > > piece of software Mike Chaney updates this like nothing on earth and > > all for the one registration. You can see the images at > > http://www.littleblueplanet.co.uk/not-QIsharpened.jpg and > > http://www.littleblueplanet.co.uk/QI-sharpened.jpg > > > > and readmore about Qimage at > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qimage/messages > > > > Not very user friendly admittedly but bl**dy good at what it does. > > > > Gareth > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bernie Ess" > > <albatros-@g...> wrote: > >> Hi, since I have started archival b&w printing on an Epson 1160 > > with > >> MIS - FS mostly - I have always printed with the Epson driver out > > of > >> PS. However I keep reading hymns of praise about Qimage. I remember > >> having tried out an evaluation version of Qimage some time ago, but > > I > >> found the program hardly understandable to use and gave up quickly. > >> > >> So my question is: Could one achieve better results when printing - > >> avter having applied the curves for the inks in PS - out of Qimage? > >> > >> Has anyone had good results with this? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Bernie > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > ---------------------~--> > > Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark > > Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & > > Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/ucIolB/TM > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ --- > > ~-> > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls > > and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish > > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > > this same page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > > keep them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject > > header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the > > various resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > Regards, > > Loring Palleske > Creative Imaging > 416.301.1711
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Qimage better for printing than photoshop?
2003-08-12 by garethlock4472
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.