Dave, thanks for your answer. The bad news is that inks positions have been switched, and this means that old curves are totally useless (otherwise minor tweakings by pure trial&error might have been enough), and I really need ink separation, working on a 1160 (six-inks printers can probably get away very well with simpler workflows such as Woolf's). The good news is that these inks actually seem better... Anyone else? -----Original Message----- From: Dave Tevis [mailto:dave@...] Sent: giovedì 4 ottobre 2001 02.06 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: MIS Full spectrum. Reports? Alex, I've been using the FS inks for a while now. I also used the original quads and the differences are noticable... for me anyway. Though I never could get the Brandon curves to work, I had good results with the Nevins transfer curves. Since I switched inks I use the John Woolf workflow. My prints look great. The most noticable difference is a cooler tone. They also have the tones shifted to the lighter end of the scale, and a deeper black. Another item of interest is that they changed the ink tone placment. ( which tone feeds which head ) It now matches the Piezo system. So if you switch you will need new cartridges, and a new workflow. Brandon curves will be way off. Woolf method is good. Good Luck Dave --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Alessandro Pardi <alessandro.pardi@i...> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone has had the chance to try the MIS Full spectrum inks and to compare them with the original MIS quads. I get very satisfactory results (except for weakish blacks) with the original quads and Brandin's workflow, but I'm afraid his curves wouldn't work with these new inks. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: MIS Full spectrum. Reports?
2001-10-04 by Alessandro Pardi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.