Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: MIS Full spectrum. Reports?

2001-10-04 by Alessandro Pardi

Dave,
 
thanks for your answer. The bad news is that inks positions have been
switched, and this means that old curves are totally useless (otherwise
minor tweakings by pure trial&error might have been enough), and I really
need ink separation, working on a 1160 (six-inks printers can probably get
away very well with simpler workflows such as Woolf's). The good news is
that these inks actually seem better...
Anyone else?
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Tevis [mailto:dave@...]
Sent: giovedì 4 ottobre 2001 02.06
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: MIS Full spectrum. Reports?



Alex,

I've been using the FS inks for a while now.  I also used the 
original quads and the differences are noticable... for me 
anyway. Though I never could get the Brandon curves to work, I 
had good results with the Nevins transfer curves. Since I 
switched inks I use the John Woolf workflow. My prints look 
great.

The most noticable difference is a cooler tone. They also have 
the tones shifted to the lighter end of the scale, and a deeper 
black. Another item of interest is that they changed the ink tone 
placment. ( which tone feeds which head ) It now matches the 
Piezo system. So if you switch you will need new cartridges, and 
a new workflow. Brandon curves will be way off. Woolf method is 
good.

Good Luck
Dave

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Alessandro Pardi 
<alessandro.pardi@i...> wrote:
> Hi all,
>  
> I was wondering if anyone has had the chance to try the MIS 
Full spectrum inks and to compare them with the original MIS quads. I get 
very satisfactory results (except for weakish blacks) with the original 
quads and Brandin's workflow, but I'm afraid his curves wouldn't work with 
these new inks.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.