RE: [Digital BW] Re: MIS Full spectrum. Reports?
2001-10-04 by Alessandro Pardi
Dave, thanks for your answer. The bad news is that inks positions have been switched, and this means that old curves are totally useless (otherwise minor tweakings by pure trial&error might have been enough), and I really need ink separation, working on a 1160 (six-inks printers can probably get away very well with simpler workflows such as Woolf's). The good news is that these inks actually seem better... Anyone else?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: Dave Tevis [mailto:dave@...] Sent: giovedì 4 ottobre 2001 02.06 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: MIS Full spectrum. Reports? Alex, I've been using the FS inks for a while now. I also used the original quads and the differences are noticable... for me anyway. Though I never could get the Brandon curves to work, I had good results with the Nevins transfer curves. Since I switched inks I use the John Woolf workflow. My prints look great. The most noticable difference is a cooler tone. They also have the tones shifted to the lighter end of the scale, and a deeper black. Another item of interest is that they changed the ink tone placment. ( which tone feeds which head ) It now matches the Piezo system. So if you switch you will need new cartridges, and a new workflow. Brandon curves will be way off. Woolf method is good. Good Luck Dave --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Alessandro Pardi <alessandro.pardi@i...> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone has had the chance to try the MIS Full spectrum inks and to compare them with the original MIS quads. I get very satisfactory results (except for weakish blacks) with the original quads and Brandin's workflow, but I'm afraid his curves wouldn't work with these new inks. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]