--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Did you notice that Wilhelm is now (July 25, 2003 posting) saying EEM with > B&W UC pigment printing is good for >150 years of display (with or without > UV protection) and 110 years of dark storage? Could you post links to these Wilhelm statements? The only Wilhelm EEM/pigmented ink things I've seen say 'in testing...' I'm a digiprint newbie whose only really tried EEM and Museo. I'm really curious as to the (relative) archivalness of EEM, because it's so cheap and so far gives me way sharper, nicer images than Museo. BTW thanks Paul for all your work with the MIS inksets and PS curves. For now I'm doing B&W with black only ala Clayton Jones, but am considering getting a dedicated hextone 1280 next time I've got $700 laying around :-) Peace, Sanaka > > Recall that he'd previously said there would be yellowing in 30 years with > EAM. > > I noticed a change in EEM/EAM about the time Wilhelm made the 30 year > yellowing statement, and I guessed the remark had caused Epson to address > that disastrous statement. Now the cynic in me wonders whether the paper > formula really changed enough to hold off yellowing for 110 years or ... > something else changed. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: Epson Enhanced Matte & Wilhelm
2003-08-23 by Sanaka
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.