OK, time to stop lurking on this forum, and in my digital photo practice, and start printing B/W. I got the 2200 'cause I believed the Epson hype on B/W. Silly me. I love the color prints it delivers, but when it comes to B/W, somehow just can't believe that even the IP RIP is actually going to give me B/W from color inks. It's still just color dots, no matter how well balanced - maybe I'm a purist, but it's not Black And White. I think I just have to bite the bullet and realize that one printer can't and maybe shouldn't 'do it all.' As far as B/W Inks, from what I'm reading about 7 Ink B/W formulations for the 2200, it seems like overkill (and a lot of money). Do I want such a degree of control over Warmth to Cool tones? Me personally: no. I was never much for toning in the darkroom beyond a little selenium here and there, so particularly at the beginning of this learning curve/experience curve, one excellent neutral archival carbon pigment B/W print would be great. So what do I really need? Should I convert my trusty 4-color Epson 980 (I believe MIS still makes carts for it) to B/W? Is the resolution of the 4-color Epsons sufficient? Is Quadtone really all I need? Or should I pick up a 1280 and go 6 inks? Or is there that much more acuity to the 2200 for B/W work and I should trade-off on inks and clean seven nozzles with cleaner cartridges between B/W and Ultrachromes? What's the consensus? JT
Message
7 Inks, 6 Inks, 4 Inks...?
2003-08-25 by John Tarnoff
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.