Digital BW, The Print

Mitch:  You're being defensive and I haven't even flamed you yet 
<g>.  "Can't believe" is a figure of speech.  I've seen all the 
comments on IP and respect the judgment of all concerned (you 
included).  As I said: maybe I'm a purist, and maybe that's not 
necessarily a good thing.  It would be nice if I could eval. the IP 
software, but haven't found a way to do so (as they don't seem to 
offer a trial).  If there's a real one-stop-shop solution, that's 
obviously great.

Do you find that you're getting the same richness in your blacks that 
you would expect from a carbon, or, for that matter, from a silver 
gelatin print?

See, you can tell me something!

JT


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mitch Alland 
<malland@x> wrote:
> For: John Tarnoff
> 
> >  I love the color prints it delivers, but when it comes to B/W, 
> > somehow just can't believe that even the IP RIP is actually going 
to 
> > give me B/W from color inks.  It's still just color dots, no 
matter 
> > how well balanced - maybe I'm a purist, but it's not Black And 
White.
> 
> I see, you haven't seen prints made on the 2200 with ImagePrint but 
you 
> "just can't believe it's "actually going to give "B&W from color 
inks." 
> Well, if you're not going to believe it, then it's not worth trying 
to 
> tell you anything.
> 
> --Mitch/Potomac, MD