Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: The Value of carbon B&W Prints

2003-09-02 by Justin Florentine

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yeah, totally.  I love it when people forget that reproducing a wet 
print is just as easy.  Any fine art photographer who intends to sell 
reproductions of a print that they spent hours dodging and burning will 
take the final print, set it up in a studio,  and burn a roll of film 
taking pictures of the final print.  This makes it almost just as easy 
to reproduce.  At least easy enough that a trained monkey could do it.

People don't pay artists for their blood, sweat, and tears.  They buy 
things of aesthetic merit from them.



Mark Hahn wrote:

|First of all, I think that there is no comparison between photography
|and fine art painting, but just because a painting takes hours to
|complete doesn't mean that it has any real value at all.  There are
|many terrible painting done by bad artists every day which have no
|value.
|
|Photos are different, even traditional prints.  Many traditional
|prints can be duplicated just as successfully as digital images, in
|fact I would avoid almost taking any shot that I knew would require
|hours of darkroom manipulation... since there are infinite images to
|grab, while pick ones that are going to be hard?
|
|Value is set by those paying for the photos, there is no inherent
|value to anything.  If people are happy to pay you might as well be
|happy to sell to them:)
|
|mark
|
|...
|
|>There seems to be a lot of people on this site that sell their
|
|digital
|
|>prints.  How have you rationalized this in your mind?  Do you sell
|
|a limited
|
|>edition of an individual print?  Once you sell out of a popular
|
|print are
|
|>you tempted to hit "print" again and make more?  It would be easy
|
|wouldn't
|
|>it?  :)
|>
|>What does everyone think about this?
|
|...
|
|
|
|Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
|
|http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
|
|If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to 
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this 
same page.
|
|Please follow these basic guidelines:
|- Include your full name with your message.
|- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
|- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
keep them short.
|- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
|- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
|- Complete your Yahoo profile.
|- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various resources on the homepage.
|
|
|
|
|Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/VKlYu7srlnPHEE8RAp4QAJwLafBGLrv0sr4pAzAR+ttx74lJswCfUFFs
0HyOFukjQiK0WxQoHMKmvNw=
=F1Rf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.