Hello Martin, >I would appreciate any feed back from users, and any suggestions for >alternatives. I am also considering investing in this system. I haven't used it but do have a set of prints used for the Technical Print Review article. Here are my observations: 1) Besides being truly dotless, with no metamerism and the highest resolution of all the samples in the review, I like the colors - they seem more "convincing" than some of the other systems. 2) I currently have a Septone print on PhotoRag on my window sill (14 days now) where it gets a tiny bit of direct sunlight early in the morning and bright reflected daylight all day, for about 9-10 hrs per day. I have parts of the images covered, and so far cannot see any trace of shifting/fading. The earlier generation of inks I've used would have shown some by now. So the inks appear to be more stable than previous inks. 3) If the software works as advertised it should be a flexible and easy to use system with reasonable cost. The incrementally adjustable color tone is a very attractive feature for me. The inks are available in bottles and Daniel Staver reports being able to refill the 2100 carts. 4) In my dealings with R9 during the print review I found them to be very open and responsive to user input. Others have reported similar good stories. I hope this helps. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Its time to jump? Septones for 2100?
2003-09-11 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.